In recent days (as well in past times, off and on) I'd gotten myself tweaked by and reacting to something another had written on a blog. The writing touched upon a topic and comments were made to which I know from my lived experience to be not as I have experienced or know from my being labeled many times over, a "mystic", but more so from God providing through of all persons, my mother who on earth did not appreciate Catholicism, to state it softly. In that book I found my people, my types, the ones who were on earth like my own self who had been also labeled different--good, but different, nice but different, wonderful, special, but unlike anyone they'd ever known. And some in the Catholic world, were more harsh, labeling me weird and odd, crazy,, with no compliments attached.
I'd gotten myself involved, writing on my blog site the past few posts on the topic, discussing labels; and they simply do not matter, not to His Real Presence nor to any in heaven, and won't to me or you in heaven, either. The person wrote and wanted to have a back-and-forth online discussion of the labels, use citations of "scholars" and those who are labeled experts on the topic. But do what their opinions and thoughts, rational and intelligent as they are, much research done--and plenty of scholars disagreeing on the labels--matter since the labels are being interchanged consistently and have been for awhile now?
Too late to put the cat back in the bag, and that, I realized, is not His Real Presence's will for me, not His will for my mission and purpose, regardless of the mystic label that priests and the like have given to describe my type. But it's the what the very persons themselves of the past, given that label, who have helped me understand my like-kind, no matter what we are called. Nor does it matter that others are called that label who may not be that to which the label a long time ago had meaning and certain attributes now blurred.
I learned many lessons in throughout the consideration of debate or argument of the labels, scholarly and opined both, with my input being mostly that of personal experience as being one of the labels. I wrote in another post of how easily I got off track. Off track from what His Real Presence wills of me, and what I most enjoy in writing--and found I do not at all enjoy debating on labels that scholars and those deemed experts do not agree on. All I have is my lived experience and these others of which I was first introduced to in the book my late mother had sent me prior to my becoming a Catholic. The book she would likely not have purchased had the author used "St." or "Bl" in front of all but one of the persons's names in the anthology of autobiographies, titled, Enduring Grace: Seven Women Mystics."
That was my introduction to "mystic" other than my former husband in a letter left the day he left us, had listed out what bothered him to the point of dislike and hate, that he did not like nor understand my "mysticism". I had to look up the word in the dictionary--was way before internet. The definition was not concrete, words about mysterious and ethereal, etc. I did not see that of me. But reading the seven women's lives--I had a major awareness and rejoicing of finding my people, my friends who understood me and I understood them!
The previous blog explains further, that the labels nor discussion agreeing or not, does not interest me for it is not going to matter relative to my life today or going forward, nor in heaven--whatever label I am or if people know the difference in the labels' now being used interchangeably, or if they think or try what is not my experience nor that of those I hold dear, my friends who in life and in our temporal world are yet labeled as "mystics". It simply does not matter in the long run, and it definitely is not what I'm to be writing about or I'd sense that combination of joy, peace, and purpose fulfilled for His Real Presence, within me. Instead, I've been writing about that which has been not at all uplifting nor seemingly all that beneficial for you my blog readers nor any of us in what His Real Presence most truly wills of us!
I wrote, as I feel it is my penance to be humbled and for my divergence too much into the weeds of temporal labels that are not even set, and as to defining what is a mystic, even the definitions on line do not capture or are not accurate in some ways. Words can't concisely define what of itself is nebulous and ineffable as much as mystics' lives and experiences are often either ineffable or filled with downright bizarre--and not always positive, temporal experiences which defy normalcy even in temporal mindsets.
In every respect be “quick to hear but slow to speak” lest there befall you what Solomon mentions: “If you see a man who is quick with words, know that a fool has more hope than he.” (Pr 29:20 LXX). Nor should anyone presume to teach in words what he has not previously done in deeds. Our Lord taught us by his own example that we should follow this order, as it is said, as it is said: “Which Jesus began to do and teach.” (Acts 1:1) Be careful therefore that you do not jump to teaching before you have acted and be counted among those of whom the Lord speaks to his disciples in the gospel: “Observe and do what they say but do not do according to their works. For they bind heavy burdens, hard to carry, and place them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves do not move them with their finger.” (Mt 23:4) For if the person “who breaks the least commandment and teaches people so shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven,” it follows that whoever neglects many great things and dares to teach is certainly not merely least in the kingdom of heaven but should be considered greatest in the punishment of Gehenna.
Therefore, you should be careful lest you be stirred to teach by the example of those who have acquired skill in speaking and a fluent tongue and who are believed by those who are unable to discern its power and character to possess spiritual knowledge because they can say whatever they want elaborately and at length. For it is one thing to speak with ease and beauty and another to enter deeply into heavenly sayings and to contemplate profound and hidden mysteries with the most pure eye of the heart, because certainly neither human teaching nor worldly learning but only purity of mind will possess this, through the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit.
No comments:
Post a Comment